Chandler, if you look at happy ending's first post the most obvious conclusion to draw is goldigger. I even said that on further definition that she had more substantial reasons to what she was saying, that I accepted, even though on the face of it she blended in with the vacuous crowd of lazy money grabbing women.
WildChild, I'd call a man that expects to be supported by his woman as a scrubber, or a rather unmanly man, or whatever other undefined word there would be for it. I'm not saying that it's right for men to sponge of women (although we do have some serious catching up to do).
Absolutely agreed. If you want to be treated equally, make something of your life and don't rely on your breasts to pay your bills.Originally Posted by Toni
No1, the W word means exchanging sex for money right? The oldest trade in the book. So yes, when women base their relationship on money, as far as I'm concerned, they fit the bill of the 'W' word perfectly. But then, there are men that have no redeeming traits save their money anyway, and where would they be without money craving women? I'm not saying that this sort of arrangement shouldn't exist, just that it should be called what it is; prostitution.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
, that person can be younger than the op.... not to put age into a box, rather it is the more mature male, who doesn't view football, meat pies, beer and mates, as his main priorities rather his relaxation time, personal space.




Bookmarks