Forum:

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Stay Or Go?

  1. #1
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default Stay Or Go?

    Become a member to remove this ad.

    Let me begin with assumptions;

    Firstly, that the first time the public heard Bill
    was unfaithful to Hillary was not the first time
    Bill was unfaithful to Hillary.

    Secondly, that the first time the public heard
    Bill was unfaithful to Hillary was not the first
    time Hillary knew Bill was unfaithful.

    Thirdly, that the first time B was unfaithful
    to H, was before he became Governor.

    The third is not crucial to this discussion, it
    merely leaves open an extra door.

    The fact is that Bill was unfaithful and Hillary
    did not leave him.

    This is the discussion I wish to open;

    1) Leave him or Not?
    2) Stay why?


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  2. #2
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default The B & H Story--prologe




    You know your man is unfaithful.
    Do you go or do you stay?

    Using the paradigm of Bill and Hillary Clinton
    the base might be;

    Would Hillary be in the position she is today
    if she had divorced him?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  3. #3
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default B & H part 1


    Today, Hillary Clinton is running for President.
    Would she be in this position today, if she
    had divorced Bill Clinton?

    Let us go back...
    to the first time she caught him.

    I make an assumption it was before he
    became Govenor.

    I make the assumption that the usual
    crying, promising, begging, promises
    took place.

    I make the assumption that H went
    through the usual devastation, hysteria
    pain, the first time.

    I make the assumption that he told her
    whatever it was to keep her.

    I make the assumption that there was
    a thought in her mind that staying with
    him would be better.

    Maybe this thought came out of love.
    Maybe it came, as mercenary, in the belief
    he would go far, or in vested self interest
    that right now was not the time to end
    the marriage, or simply because she couldn't
    take the emotional trauma of a divorce at
    that moment.

    Whatever it was, Hillary stayed.

    Was it the right decision?

    Hillary as political being would have to admit
    yes. But Hillary as woman?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  4. #4
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default B & H part 2



    Because H remained married to B, she moved
    into the Govenor's mansion, then into the White
    House.

    Because H remained married to B she was First
    Lady, and then, Senator from New York.

    If she had divorced B as he entered the Govenor's
    Mansion, or shortly after, had she divorced him
    over the Monica affair, would she be a Senator
    from New York who is running for President?

    The answer is probably No.

    Had she divorced him in Arkansas, there would have
    been another woman in the Govenor's Mansion and
    in the White House.

    Clearly, being B's wife opened the door to her, and
    kept it open, so that today, H can run for President.

    In a strictly mercenary manner, not divorcing her
    husband was the correct choice.

    She lost nothing by staying, for her manner of
    confronting the adultery did not detract from
    her but added.

    There was no harpy screeching, there was no
    dramatics, she dealt with it business like, and
    quietly.

    Perhaps the imperatives of politics made it so,
    but then, we have witnessed the melt down
    of Prince Charles marriage to Diane, which was
    surely not done with restraint or decorum.

    H has done/said nothing about the affair which
    would in anyway effect her reputation, or that
    of B.

    But what of the woman behind the name?
    What of other women married to unfaithful men?



    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  5. #5
    Junior Member inshock is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    22

    Default

    These are great questions.

    Shortly after the H & B scandal broke I spent 3 months in Europe. The nearly unanimous reaction to the predicament AND the American reaction was laughter. Every European I discussed the matter with thought it was trivial and blown out of proportion by Americans. This intrigued me and begs the question: why is the European view of sexuality so different?

    I didn’t agree with any of the individuals I discussed the H & B scandal with. But it expanded my perspective.

    What is sexuality? Have we really diverged from our biological roles in the last millennia? I think our inherent gender roles play a huge part. Men of power, influence, and popularity have risen to that stature by being the largest cave man with the biggest club. Our evolution has offered a niche for brainy aches as well (Bill Gates) but their role is different. They advance the tools men like Bill Clinton wield.

    I’m sure Hillary entered that relationship with ideals, the knight is shining armor sort. But as their relationship evolved she was faced with tough decisions. Do we doubt Bill’s love for Hillary because of his actions? I don’t. I don’t think she does either or she surely would have left. No doubt the situation has brought her shame and embarrassment BUT it has also given her, as you point out, great power.

    In any situation we weight the totality of the circumstances to decide our course of action. We are inherently selfish. Hillary made her decision by weighing everything important to her and her long term goals in life. If she didn’t believe Bill was on his way to the top would she have stayed? Women want the man with the biggest club.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  6. #6
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default Jamaican Perspective


    In Jamaica we refer to oral sex as 'rifle cleaning' or 'wash off'.
    It is not considered sex qua sex.

    Many men do not ask or expect their wives to perform it.
    The remarks of Robert de Niro in 'Analyse This' :

    "...do that with the same mouth she uses to kiss my children?"
    is held by many many people.

    If a man goes out to have his 'rifle cleaned' or to get a
    'wash off', it is taken in the same way as if he went to
    a female barber.

    So the view of "Oral Sex is Sex" is not held universally.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  7. #7
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default B & H epiloge


    In some relationships the venture into infidelity
    can not be borne by one party. There is no way
    to wrap the mind around the betrayal.

    In others, the offended party forgives the adultery.

    In a few cases, the marriage continues, just as good
    as or better than it was before.

    In many cases, the forgiven takes this as a carte blanche,
    the mistake is not being unfaithful, it is being caught.

    Firstly; saying...."How could you do this to me?"
    suggests that you existed in his mind when he opened
    his zipper.

    Secondly; thinking...."What did I do wrong?"
    is taking 'guilt' or 'responsibility' for an action
    as related to you as the Kendal Crash, (if you
    don't know what that is, the analogy works even
    better).

    Forgiving the adultery makes you available for
    more adultery.

    Bill was not in love with Monica. She was an available
    pair of lips. If she wasn't available, then it would be
    someone else. But to think that Monica qua Monica
    had any importance whatsoever is to miss the true
    nature of this kind of serial adultery.

    And asking...

    "Why does H put up with it?" or
    "How can she stay married to B?"

    Misses the point.
    The point being; the management of adultery.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  8. #8
    Junior Member inshock is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    22

    Default

    I think the only way to manage adultry by a partner is to truly believe it won't happen again. This requires an expression of unfettered regret and sorrow by the adulterer. For the woman under the politician to survive Hillary must believe he husband has changed and learned his lesson. No doubt she believed this after Bill endured the scandal and embarrassment the fallout from his actions brought. Gore lost the subsequent election and Clinton's legacy is now tainted because of his actions. Not to mention Hillary has secured the compassion and sympathy of the nation which when combined with the dignity and inner strength she showed during and after the scandal broke has enhanced her public image and popularity.

    I think coping with adultery requires an honest belief that the situation will not repeat itself AND a way to mitigate the damage so that something positive is yielded from the experience.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  9. #9
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default When I hear a goat scream....


    I think Hillary reached the stage that a woman
    I know, married to a man who seems unable
    to keep his zipper locked has...

    She said;

    "When I hear a goat scream at night, I
    assume my husband is on it..."

    I think even before Monica Hillary had reached
    the stage that Bill was like that woman's
    husband.

    All she can do is hope he doesn't embarrass her.
    What she has to pray for is that he's not caught
    with another female to mess up her campaign.

    considering his nature, It's a 75% chance that
    between now and the election in 2008 Bill
    will be caught with his pants down.



    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

  10. #10
    kaylar
    Guest

    Default Tit for Tat


    A point which I've circled for a while is
    whether a woman has carte blanche
    once her spouse cheats.

    The answer I would give is no.
    Don't compound his adultery with
    your own.

    Firstly, why bother to get involved in an
    affair which is; in a true sense, an ego
    boost for the husband, (although he'll
    never realise it).

    Joan, annoyed with Craig's affair decided
    to launch one of her own.

    She met Earl and virtually shoved him into
    bed to fix her husband. The time she
    was with Earl it was; "Take that, Craig!"
    and Earl became an animate dildo.

    He didn't realise it at first, then it dawned
    on him that Joan was using him. She wasn't
    having sex with him, she was punishing Craig.

    The hurt Joan caused Earl might be 'collateral
    damage', but Earl is a living being with feelings.

    The affair with Earl died quietly and eventually
    Craig and Joan divorced, and another woman
    told Joan how badly she had hurt Earl.

    At first it was like, so what? But later on she
    realised what she had done.

    She had taken a marriage which might have
    been fixed, might have died on it's own, but
    forced it into a grave, using Earl as the tombstone.


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Share with Facebook

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Beauty & Style | Fitness & Nutrition | Family & Relationships | Sex & Sexual Health | Physical & Mental Health | Girl Talk | Forum Home
Home | Health Library | Contact | Terms Of Service
© Womens-Health.com 2011+