Thread: For the Females: Testicle Size an Issue?

Thanks much for the replies Ladies - much appreciated.
I really do feel much better knowing this.

...and yes, LB I keep them clean and trimmed - I'm a fastidious kind of guy.
Even in my everyday (work and home) life, I'm a neat freak :0) not compulsive, but I'm certainly not a slob either.

Size of balls don't really matter to me. Although, I do like how they get really tight and hard right before my man orgasms, thats a turn on.

I wonder if the testosterone does is too high. It may be that your testicles were producing some testosterone but not enough. Your response is good but the fact that your testicles shrank means that you may just have needed enough drug to make up the deficit and let your testicles still function. If they were doing the job with a little help from the drug, they would stay the same size.

Originally Posted by Allie602

I wonder if the testosterone does is too high. It may be that your testicles were producing some testosterone but not enough. Your response is good but the fact that your testicles shrank means that you may just have needed enough drug to make up the deficit and let your testicles still function. If they were doing the job with a little help from the drug, they would stay the same size.

Thank you! I asked the same question to my doctor and she straight up answered (not an actual quote, but an interpretation) "why are you worried about shrinkage, as long as all the benefits are back". Now I thought that to be an odd response personally, as I thought you only medicate enough to make up for any deficiencies, not to completely overwhelm the system to the point of failure. I know that its not really failure of an organ or organs [plural] as it may be, but when the body gets test from external sources, it says "screw it, I don't need to do this anymore" and that part of the body shuts down - exactly why they say not to overuse cortizone... Your body produces this but if you use too much cort creme, it will stop producting it, bringing some less than desirable consequences along the way.

Anyhow, the way I understand it - there are additional hormones that sort of go hand-in-hand with test, and its generally accepted that you should not do one without the other or you end up with a few less than plesent side effects like shinking balls, and in some cases BOOBS! Now, let me tell you, though I love boobs (uuummmm booobs! [in a homer simpson tone] ), I know I wont like them on me! I have yet to have anything even close to THAT happen but again, if it did I would be devistated. I have a hard body with a very muscular appearance, and the thought of man boobs is FRIGHTENING!
To make a long story longer - Doc said I dont need the other hormones and all should be fine, contrary to what many online articles offer.

Saying all of this, is losing the aesthetics of larger boys worth the benefits? Yes I beleive it is, and in reality, it's probably too late to reverse it anyhow, but that doesn't relegate competency as a doctor.

So I'm glad I'm not the only one who first thought that maybe it should be a supplement to a deficiency, not a replacement for all of it.

Thanks again Allie, as always you hit the nail on the head.


...and thank you Lizzard for your response and insight as well! Appreciated.

Originally Posted by ManINeedACoffee

For me, it's not a big deal, either, as long as they're there and not gargantuan. I dated a guy once who was *ahem* born very lucky, but, I have to be frank - his balls were overlarge enough to kind of weird me out. Okay, fine, I'll just say it - they sagged pendulously, okay?!

Yeesh. Anyway.

I can see where you're coming from. I would think that guy talk can mess with a guy's self image just as much as girl talk can mess with a woman's self image. If you and your wife are having great sex again, then I think you're good to go!

But whatever you do, DO NOT wear sweatpants in public.

I am fairly new here and just noted this thread. I realize it is fairly old, so perhaps my thoughts are irrelevant.

I find “manIneedacoffee” comments (above) to be a little troubling. First, after she states the “it’s not a big deal” she outlines a man she once dated as being “born real lucky” because he had overlarge testicles. She then stated that they sagged pendulously – which is ripe with pornographic imagery. I am not an advocate of pornography and would argue it quite harmful to relationships and pornography is usually focused on women with larger breasts or men with larger penises or testicles.

I find that “manIneedacoffee” comments to be bi-modal and not helpful to the OP.