People take the meaning of the Bible to fit what they wish. Some take if literally word for word (similar to the strict Constructionists of the Constitution) while other take the meaning of lessons as guides for how to treat and interact with people.
I lean to the later in that the underlying moralality is more important than the literal word. There has to be a fluidity of the meaning in order for it to be relevant to the way societies have evolved and with the understanding that there are many different religions and philosophies.
If you look at the underlying meanings within the writings of many of the great religions, I think you'd see a great many similarities in the belief systems. When you take literal meanings, you end up with wars.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
If we look at this in the most basic setting of man woman, a relationship, I prefer to be equal. I love to have a man that steps up to the plate and is bringing the same to the table as I am. Of course I don't mean the same type of hobbies and all that. But if I'm willing to learn, I'd hope he's willing to teach and vice versa. I feel as though the strongest relationships contain a lot of give and take, and helping to build each other stronger and better than the previous day. So all this nonsense about one gender overruling the other is just that: nonsense.



Bookmarks