Forum:

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: ivf babe is very wrong method ........

  1. #1
    imported_KAWA
    Guest

    Default ivf babe is very wrong method ........

    Become a member to remove this ad.
    Pipe (tube) Children ... ivf babe is very wrong method ........



    That the children of pipes ( tube) IVF babe, where egg ( ova) of women (wife) Fertilized by any sperm of men (husbands) outside the body of women - in laboratory test tubes - is very wrong . The reason for this is that during this process will be subjected to egg (ova) women and any sperm of men as well as fertilized egg (zygote) these three structures will be

    exposed to light ,and that this light will affect very on content living in these structures, such as genetic gene mounted on chromosomes and the rest of molecular insisted in sperm and egg ( ova), and zygote. saitoblazim, nucleus ... etc. living structures . . . . . These influences will appear on the fetus and child pipeline ( tube) ivf babe in the future after childbirth or after adulthood or after marriage or in the second generation of any sons and grandsons of the children pipes ivf babes.

    Because in the case of Fertilized naturally which come for direct sexual meting (fornication) between men and women (spouses), the process of Fertilized Labroid through sperm take place inside the uterus and at the place of dark-light accounts never materialize.



    Final Note

    *************

    Is not that photographic paper which we have created in camera personal is the most sensitive to light or any sperm or semen, to any human (sperm)? If exposure photographic paper to light before put it in the camera, the effect will override, will not serve to capture images of personal events and travels because it will be-burnt or sparked once offered light.

    Does any sperm or semen in particular to the men and egg (ova) of women containing thousands of genes genetic on chromosomes

    It holds all the information that is deposited, but also affected by light. Harm emerge only on human to be created in .....

    Agricultural Engineer:



    kawa Shafiq Saber

    _______________________________________



    During the Process of IVF Child (BABE), the sperm of man (male), the ova (egg) of women (female), and the Fetus(zygote).Will Exposed to light because the process Implement

    Outside the body (Uterus) of women with Offer and Available of light.

    But In the case of Natural Fertility of ova(egg) by sperm inside the body (uterus),Mean Having direct Sexual contact between woman and man the process Happen and occur

    In Darkness Place inside Uterus of women completely Away from light.

    And this light Affect on Hereditary genes which are Portable on Chromosomes,

    And the IVF Child (BABE) will suffer FROM Hereditary Diseases IN Future .



    __________________________________________

  2. #2
    imported_kara
    Guest

    Default

    what does this mean???

  3. #3
    Veteran Member Array AFemaleProdigy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    654
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    As this is your personal opinion and what I am guessing to be purely theory, there is no scientific evidence that this would happen if exposed to indoor laboratory lights. If IVF was effected by any form of light rays, then the doctors and lab technicians would take measures to prevent this by using specially made lights. If you want to relate to your camera/film metaphor... that is why they created "dark rooms". So that the film is not exposed to light rays.

    Regardless, this is human tissue we are talking about. Not camera film. Everyone knows that light rays from indoor light bulbs DO NOT effect human tissue. They especially do not burn tissue, create image transfer, and most certainly would not effect genetic make up (DNA). Only ultraviolet rays will do that. Obviously, the doctors and lab techs would not have ultraviolet bulbs in the laboratory.

    It is my opinion that IVF is safe and could be a wonderful thing for women and men who cannot conceive naturally.
    ~Jessica


  4. #4
    imported_kara
    Guest

    Default

    thank you.

  5. #5
    VIP Member Array miss_srs101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    34

    Default

    where the **** did u get this information and like femaleprodigy thats your opinion and if this process was such a big issue and it did affect babies in the nature im sure there would be alot of fertility clinics out of business. question how many situations have you heard of that this has actually affected the health of a child **** you have women still sperm from men and injecting it into them selfs with turkey baseters so if thats how you feel about the situation dont knock it this process is a life saving thing for women you cant conceive on their own so dont come here and discourage people even though you can voice your opinion its about the way you do it....

  6. #6
    VIP Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    60

    Default

    Didn't the first test-tube baby give birth recently to a perfectly healthy child? So there seems to be no evidence at the moment that light is harmful to sperm or ova.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Beauty & Style | Fitness & Nutrition | Family & Relationships | Sex & Sexual Health | Physical & Mental Health | Girl Talk | Forum Home
Home | Health Library | Contact | Terms Of Service
© Womens-Health.com 2011+