And what is the problem again?
The OP hasn't been around since Dec so we don't know what her situation has done, but she isn't the only one dealing with this. Some people have trouble with giving. There is emotional giving and sharing, there is economic, there is physical/sexual. Some people confuse one for the other; they think that providing economically is enough, whether to their children or their spouse. Sometimes rather than money, this is cooking and cleaning.
Giving emotionally is giving of yourself and there are degrees to this. It includes sharing your feelings, wants, needs, and desires. It is expressed in words, touch, looks and acts of caring. Physical/sexual giving can be touch, kisses, hugs, sex (within an appropriate relationship), or simply being there.
In a good relationship there is a balance. In any area the giving and sharing has to be done freely. People who keep mental account books of finances and contributions aren't giving, they are accounting. They aren't in a relationship so much as a business. They can't balance intangibles and it's really the intangibles that count. They are the ones who see that they paid for the mortgage, which is big and see things like costs for food and clothing and TP as "little" stuff, somehow it never hits them that this stuff adds up - fast. When things fall apart they see the house as theirs, they paid for it. The rest doesn't count. The food they ate for years is long gone, the cleaning and work to maintain the house that someone else did doesn't have a dollar value to them - they don't really "see" it. By the same token they are usually takers sexually and emotionally too. If they get a bj, they see that as "we" had sex. The fact that only one of the parties got any attention or got off escapes them entirely. If they aren't interested in sex, they are satisfied and see no reason to concern themselves with the other person's needs.
When life was agriculture based, men and women both had to work and produce for survival. Actually children worked too. Women, because they nursed babies, often took care of things closer to home. But both gender's work was vital to family survival. As we developed more labor saving systems and technology, roles changed and by various mechanisms including religion, gender roles became more rigid and defined - even legislated. Women became part of the property and their contributions were marginalized, essential but not "counted". Marriages were generally based on proximity, economics, and social position - love was an unexpected bonus.
We have different expectations now but in many ways vestiges of the old thinking and expectations still hold. We often deal in fairy tales, the man who will sweep us off our feet and lovingly and passionately take care of us forever, the beautiful nymph who will admire a man and fulfill his every desire while requiring nothing. These are not adult relationship models. Many people hold to them at some level. There are too many people who treat others like little things that can be put up on a shelf and take down and dusted off once in a while, when they feel like it. They fail to understand that just like a car left to sit without proper maintenance will not start because the gas has varnished, the oil gone thick and settled, the battery drained; a relationship needs care and effort to keep working. Carrying the car analogy further, they also fail to understand that while with min maintenance a car (or relationship) will keep running, it's the extra care, the detailing, keeping the peripherals in good working order, that makes it sparkle and feel good to be in and comfortable to travel with.
There has to be a balance in a working relationship, it cannot be weighted too heavily in any one area. If it is all physical/sexual, it's an affair not a relationship, if it's all economic then it's a business not a marriage, if it's all emotional then it's, what? A fantasy? I don't know quite how to define that. But I think a good relationship requires awareness and effort as well as the unconscious giving and receiving that keeps it fulfilling for all involved.
And what is the problem again?
The problem was someone who doesn't give and lacks generosity or balance in economic and emotional areas of the relationship.
That is very responsible of him. Why would you chastise him for saving for his retirement? Very few people live within their means these days. This is an honorable trait. Do you want him to dependent on you?
Again - this is a very honorable and responsible thing to do. Nothing wrong here. Why are you complaining about this?
So are you saying that he should be financially responsible for your clothes and accessories? Why are you attributing your finances with his? Are you married yet?
Again, why is it expected that he buy your clothes? You're bitter that YOU had to pay for your own clothes?
Did he drink at the party? If he drank other people's things but refused to bring his own, that's cheap and in poor taste.
Didn't you say he was paying the mortgage/taxes/insurance? You don't think that is pretty substantial? Does he EVER ask you for money to pay the mortgage? I'd guess he doesn't!
That's the problem - you feel as if you need to be taken care of. You feel used but you live at his place and he pays the mortgage? I'm sorry, but in my opinion you sound like a gold digger.
You make some good points OTYA, however without the OP's replies on some of the things bought up, it may not be the case pertaining to "gold digging".
I would say he's been bought up with the value of money.
However, as I have said in a previous post, there is a fine line there of whether he's purely saving for a future, or being a scrouge...
Certainly her food purchases and the likes may add up to his mortgage repayments, so it's equal.
I think there's a lack of communication over that, there's no sharing of the "reasons".
It's the mere bottle of wine that he didn't want to purchase to contribute to a dinner party that plays a thought in my mind of scrouge....
Certainly I get the context of "-
"Feel like an un-paid servant not getting any girlfriend perks"....
We live in a society where both parties can work and both take care of their own individual needs, perks ...
But, I would be interested in knowing what Christmas Presents, Anniversary Presents are received/given by both parties..
What discussions are had over future...
And why the OP is earning 900 a month and can't obtain additional work to give herself perks that she desires.
It goes to reason though that if a woman is contributing as much as she possibly can, and is cleaning, cooking totally by herself and working as well and can't get a bottle of wine, she could feel a tad "used"....
There is equality in that as well, unless he's working all those hours for their future...
CW
Do we not realise that in order to find a soul
It doesn't happen over night
if truth were to be told.
Like everything in life that's hard to achieve
you must believe!
Bookmarks