Thread: Circumcised or Not Circumcised

Hi,
might be this question can be answered by guys out there. For me, there is no different during penerative action but if performing BJ, I would prefer the one without foreskin. It just taste better.
Do you any experienced?

I like Circumcised much better, it looks better that way..

Is there any difference with the foreskin pulled back?

I usually hear women say they prefer circumsized. Funny thing though is that when it has come up with myself and a new partner they always ask if I am, even after they have seen it, so they can't even tell the difference. In all honesty when you're erect there really is no difference as the skin pulls back. As for taste difference, I can't speak on that.

The difference in taste comes from the accumulation of sweat and natural body oils under the foreskin that can sometimes collect bacteria. Someone that is uncircumcised has to pull that foreskin back and clean under there on a daily basis and before & after sex, but some guys are just lazy about it. That is one of the major reasons why circumcisions are done routinely, at least in the US. If you are ever sexually active with a man that is uncircumcised, make sure he cleans under there beforehand.

Your right about the taste, I went out with a guy who wasn't Circumcised for about a month and any time I took it in my mouth it had like a metal taste to it, kinda gross..

Yup, might that is the big reason why women refused to do oral with partner & reluctantly to tell the truth. I usually talk to my partner if he want me to do oral, to really clean his tools. Else I would prefer not to.
I think it is really the same with guys when want to perform oral, you kinda wanna somethin' smell good, aren't you?

I much prefer circumsized, tastes better, looks better and not as sensitive in my experience.

Hi LittleLily. Not sure what answers you require from guys? There are several questions here; a) Do women prefer circumcised , and why? (if the penis is kept clean there should be no difference in taste. The woman should feel that the head is softer and slightly moist in those with foreskins) b) Do men prefer to be circumcised? (You'll find that, out of choice, the vast majority of men would prefer not to be) c) Should young boys be circumcised without their consent for whatever reason? Bearing in mind that less than 5% of males that are circumcised need it for medical reasons. (In this I think you need to consider the boy and not what the parents want) The truth is that there is absolutely no need to circumcise the vast majority of boys/men. It has become a custom so much so that no-one really thinks about the rights of the boy/man to determine his own body. Women often dismiss it as "well it's only a piece of skin" Well, they would think differently if they were male. Bottom line is - if a man wants to be circumcised for himself or for his girlfriend that's his choice and his alone! Just as women have control over their bodies, so men should as well.

By the way, there is no such term as "uncircumcised". (you don't call a small girl's ears "un-pierced" do you) There is only natural (with a foreskin) and circumcised. I don't know where the word came from but have an idea it's origins are from Jewish culture to express those who were different. Uncircumcised suggesting "unclean, unprepared, un-washed, un-godly"
With a foreskin is natural, without is not how man was created.
Just remember that God created man with a foreskin. And before anyone chips in and says that it's in the Bible, well it may be but where's the proof it ever occurred?