To be fair to another's thread, I have started this one to argue the perspective of virginity.
Personally, I laugh at the notion of anyone considering themselves pure while having engaged in sexual acts. The arguement that one is still a virgin even though they have participated in oral or anal intercourse and yet believe that they are holding to religious doctrine is obsurd to me. They will argue that since thier hymen is intact that they are still a virgin. Like a criminal mastermind that does not actually partake in the crime and yet holds to the belief that they are innocent because of that. Now, I know that there are dozens of deffinitions out there on virginity and anyone can use any of those to support their feellings on this matter. But come on! This is a one way street. Once you start, there is no going back. There are so many wholes in any one deffinition of virgin. One such will void all men of being a virgin. Another would view any women without an intact hymen a virgin even if she has not participated in intercourse.
I know people have probably posted about this subject before but I would like to hear from you anyways. So let me have it, the can is open.
CW, No I don't think all foreplay would make a person a non-virgin. I don't believe that there is such a thing as "born again virgin" and unfortunatley, through not fault of his or hers own, a molested victim is not a virgin either. (depending on the specifics) So let me have it. I said it and I'm prepared to to burned for it.![]()




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote





Bookmarks