We get a lot of traffic on this forum from young people who are confused about sex. Often, they simply state their ages, but sometimes they leave that information out.
They get asked, though. Maybe there was a problem with their grammar, or a lack of prior knowledge that one could only attribute to youth.
The question is: does it matter?
Obviously, it matters and speaks volumes that "children" are becoming sexual earlier. But what implies childhood? According to ABC news, the average age of the first period in 1830 was 17. Now it's 13. What does that bode?
Younger girls are dealing with more adult hormones sooner.
I had the unique position in high school to be a role model for younger girls. My senior year, I was in charge of my NJROTC unit, which had coincidentally attracted a larger group of female cadets than usual as first-years. As someone from a less than enjoyable family background, less than stable mental constitution, and downright below-par physical abilities, I was someone they could relate to as well as confide in.
I had cadets who did drugs, needed anti-depressants, drank heavily, had casual sex, depended on men for their self-esteem, self-harmed, ... the list goes on. All of them were around the age of 14.
I notably had one girl pull me aside one morning and show me her cut wrists. As a recovering self-harmer, it scared the daylights out of me.
The thing is, these were all bright individuals, full of life and with plenty of potential. They all knew they were making choices that weren't quite stellar. And they definitely weren't, and aren't alone. Their stories and choices were quite common with their peer group.
I could have told them, "don't do that." I could have told them all day, tired out my lungs from it. Not even their parents could control their behavior (if they'd even learned about it,) so how was I supposed to?
Instead, I chose to educate them. Seventeen magazine, a mother with mental problems, and a slew of my own problems had left me with enough hard-earned knowledge to share.
Maybe it sounds funny, but they responded really quite well to my information. Could be because they were happy to have someone who wasn't on their case.
The point is that human beings, young, old, male, or female, are pretty stubborn creatures, and they're fascinated by the taboo. If you tell someone not to do something, it may very well make them more likely to do it, and do it without the defense of information.
Don't withhold your valuable knowledge. Not from yourself, and not from others.
(Please feel free to expound and rebut as you wish. This isn't my soapbox; I'd like to hear other opinions as always.)




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Bookmarks