[caster]

I just watched a few videos. Some were part of the Beautiful Agony series and the others were from Hysterical Literature series.
I didn't post links since I'm not sure that's allowed, they are not hard to find.

But, these are a really neat test of visual stimulation, the purpose of the BA series was to show that it's the face that drives the visual stimulas.
So, my question is; How do women and man see this? The same or differently?
As a man I find it very arousing to watch although you see nothing but the womens faces. Watching a women become aroused and climax while seeing only her face.
Do women find this stimulating to see as well? (you have to watch it to have an honest opinion) It's actually pretty neat to see.

Neither of those sites are porn, but all the videos are women achieving orgasm, it's more like implied erotica.

[CHANDLERS WISH]

Hi Caster,

Is it visual only, or is there sound on those videos. Thanks for not posting the links.

I ask because I think there is a difference if there is both visual and sound.

Visualisation. Strange word that I use so much in my business. I know that 25% of people have it and 75% don't. 2 years ago, I opened a make over shop for my real estate. That means that I won't sell or rent out a house, unless I give it some form of makeover. How can someone buy or rent a home that is completely empty ? When they look on line, how does the home entice them?

So I believe visualisation is a major key to our lives..

I also think less is best. I'd rather see a woman with partial clothing than naked, and I am pretty sure men are the same. It's the not knowing that entices and therefore, visualises.

Perhaps this thread should continue as well on visualisation full stop perhaps members can relate to your question or just the word and provide their thoughts.

Good topic ..

CW

[caster]

The Literature ones are each woman is reading whatever book they choose, it's to create a distraction for the mind as the body is manipulated. All these are PG, heck almost G if you didn't know what was going on, kinda like Meg Ryan in the cafe. Watching the subject loose composure while trying to stay focused on reading is the hysterical part I suppose.
The Agony one has no sound other than the womans breathing changes and some moans as she becomes aroused. At least the few I watched.

The test IMO is to see if the face and upper body language creates arousal in the watcher, male or female. Honest, there is nothing pornographic at all as these are made to be artistic and create erotica in your mind.
I do not know it there is a series of these with men as the subject. I'll google it sometime to see.
It really is intriuging to watch.

[rcoreyus]

Pornographic and erotic are very similar - both are material intended to cause arousal. (and both are fine by me). I think that different people be excited by different things - visual, audio, and by different parts of the body. Some of it is also learned - in a culture where breasts are only shown in association with sexual activity, the sight of breasts will probably be considered more arousing than in a culture where they are see all the time.

[caster]

Well Chandler, there is a series for men, and I must say it is still arousing even as a male viewing a male. Seeing only his face as he becomes aroused and climaxes created arousal in me.
So, I have to agree with the testing, the face and body language is what arouses. Not saying the other parts don't or can't but "just" the face does regardless of male or female.
Admittedly I found the females more attractive to watch, but that had nothing to do with arousal and intrigue.

[HisGirl]

Watching the guys the way you describe would be arousing to me. I never heard of this. I am more turned on by written words from which I can then create a visual image in my head. So I guess I do respond well to visual as a product of thoughts or ideas. I'd much rather imagine a scenario than watch it played out though.