I saw a new doctor yesterday, and things went about as expected--she told me, "I'm not going to lie, most of the things I'd typically try, your past doctors have already done." But she was thorough while going through my records, and after she looked at a wet mount she came back and said it's definitely not BV and not yeast, but I do have tons and tons of white blood cells (they have been present off and on in my past wet mounts). She said if I were to come back on a really bad day (yesterday was a "good" day in terms of my symptoms), she'd bet there would be even more WBC's. She then told me that she used to be skeptical about DIV (apparently it's controversial in the medical world), but she's had a number of patients with symptoms identical to mine (and to DIV), and they all seemed to respond to a prolonged treatment of topical clindamycin, a prolonged treatment of hydrocortisone suppositories, or a prolonged treatment of intravaginal steroid cream. So, she's treating me for DIV, only this time the way it's supposed to be treated. Apparently, duricef would not treat DIV because it doesn't have the anti-inflammatory properties of clindamycin, so that's why it may not have worked for me. She's given me clindamycin cream for a month because she's pretty darn convinced I have DIV. She also sent of an HPV test so that we know for sure, since my past doctors felt like telling me I have it when they never even tested me for it.
I have mixed feelings. I don't want to be optimistic and jinx myself, but I want to believe we're finally on the right track...
Comment