You are aware that we can't post links here, are you not?
Research it. Prior knowledge would help. If we know that babies pass through vaginas which then return to their normal sizes, they'd have to be extremely durable and strong muscles.
BTW, some 10 years ago, my then g/f now ex-g/f but we're still friends showed me a "Cosmo" article about package size. It indicated that women prefer thick love muscles inside of them. She has told me more than a few dozen times that she likes 'em thick and not too long, especially when she has given head to dudes with long love muscles. I've never asked her how many dudes she's done. It's none of my business. Were I to guess, she's above average in dudes done in her age category. The point of her experience is validity of her opinions. I have and will listen to her when she talks sex. She knows that she can talk candid sex with me because I will not judge her. I know all of her sexual fantasies because she trusts sharing that knowledge with me. She has directly and tacitly told me that one of her fantasies is to be worked by a huge packaged black stud. If she wishes, hopefully she'll be able to experience her black stud fantasy. If she were still my g/f, her experiencing that fantasy would cause a substantial problem in our relationship. I can't trust a cheater.
This is really a rhetorical, academic polemic. It's not definitive. I will never let an exception invalidate a rule. That's a logical fallacy as is extremism, which is all over your second paragraph of your last post to me.
We should approach this as Socratic debate, not adversarial.
Best of luck to you.
Comment