X
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • atskitty2
    Assistant Admin
    • Aug 2013
    • 4467

    No worries amy for some, the fast steps of dating are fine. I just choose not to make that bet.

    A couple i know married 6 wks after meeting and as far as I can tell, have spent a miserable 20 yrs honoring their vows. The woman found out soon after marriage all the things that were just not important to him to mention, prior to marriage. Such as debt and the real situation with his 2 prior wives and children from those marriages.

    It's admirable to keep your vows regardless, I tell myself, and their faith has led them to peace I suppose, but from my perspective that is no quality of life. They raised a maladjusted child, and...it's just sad. I hope never to put myself in that position.

    I do know couples who married fast and were very happy and built a healthy relationship.

    Chances are more ikely that will happen with a longer time of getting acquainted, imo.

    But I've veered off course a bit.

    I do think delayed sexual relationships are better...that's why I have had so little sex since my divorce. I have dated many men and I've not slept with many at all.
    I think it's better. There must be trust and some level of comfort, due to risks involved with sex.

    Comment

    • Popcorn&Candy
      Veteran Member
      • Jun 2016
      • 1713

      When I have a crush on a guy, it gets pretty intense. However, I tend to strike up a friendship with him before getting into a relationship. A bond has to be formed for the friendship to progress into a relationship. However, I tend to know who I like rather quickly. Getting along personality-wise is crucial to getting along in a sexual relationship.

      Comment

      • WaveRider
        Veteran Member
        • Mar 2017
        • 701

        Relationships without sex are called friendships.

        Comment

        • amy40
          Veteran Member
          • Nov 2016
          • 2732

          "if the couple views marriage as uniquely sexual and sacred, they've already got a stronger compatibility......"

          agree stillness

          Comment

          • amy40
            Veteran Member
            • Nov 2016
            • 2732

            also think it's beneficial to your marriage if one hasn't had sexual partners to compare with your spouse

            Comment

            • WaveRider
              Veteran Member
              • Mar 2017
              • 701

              Hi jns,

              I've acquired wisdom long after it would've been helpful.

              Opposites might attract, but the same will stay together.

              Relationships created upon authentic friendship are longest enduring.

              I've learned that I should have not thrown good years after bad. I should've divorced the second I accepted that who I thought she was and who she really was were not congruent. When one accepts that a relationship won't last, leave. I've never known a couple who stuck it out assuming it would get better and it did. People who stick out miserable relationships are miserable. Once it goes south, it becomes a matter of how far one is willing to travel southbound before he accepts the reality that he should have left years ago. The same goes for women. Never throw good years after bad.

              I'm not sure that we can ever completely know anyone. Everyone has secrets. Everyone has a past. Women have been married to men whom they believed were businessmen but were really CIA agents. Many years ago I knew a couple that the wife knew only her husband worked in the defense industry. She had no clue of what he did. They were good with it. For all she knew, he could have developed devastating chemical weapons.

              It is possible to find your best friend with whom you're in love. When you do, keep her. Treat her like a queen, and she'll make you a king. Never settle. You'll regret it.

              A vow implies knowledge of whom you're vowing. It's invalid if a vow is the product of deception or manipulation.

              I can't begin to tell you how many men & women I know who don't talk about sex. Sadly, too many women submit to sex out of sense of obligation. Sex becomes much more intense and meaningful when couples are open with each other. Judgments should never be made nor a secret betrayed.

              My ex had a friend who never had an orgasm during sex. My ex felt sorry for her and bought her a vibrator. Her husband was a definitive goofball.

              Women will talk about sex if men would ask. But a woman would have to have trust in a man before she'll be honest about her sexual desires.

              The woman I'm now seeing and I used to be in an intense relationship. If you want to test a man's character, give him power. If you want to test a woman's character, give her adversity. My g/f's true personality came out with adversity. While I'll still hang with her, I'd never marry her. I'll leave that at that.

              My g/f and I have always been able to talk about sex. I know more about her sexual past than anyone other than her. When she was in college, she was probably known as a s_l_u_t. What she has done before she met me is none of my business. I've never judged her for her sexual past, and she has a considerable sexual past. Good for her. She had fun.

              Early in our relationship she told me what she liked and didn't like. That was useful info to know. I was and still am able to sexually satisfy her most passionate desires because we were and are comfortable with each other talking about sex.

              One of the most prominent problems in her marriage was sexual incompatibility. She's beyond sexually experienced and adventurous. He was the opposite. She tried & tried to teach him. Either he was dense or prideful because he never learned nor did he want to learn. He'd demean her for asking for something as harmless as cumming on her breasts. He called it gross. She has never forgotten that. It became so horrible for her that she viewed sex as a marital obligation. She'd have sex with him only when she could no longer put it off. It was heart wrenching to hear her tell me extremely wistfully that when she couldn't put him off, she'd bend over their dresser and let him bang her until he came. More often than not, she had to use lubricant because he wasn't working for her sexual arousal.

              If her ex had listened to her, he would have enjoyed incredible sexual pleasure that would have created an unbreakable bond. I'll always try to do what she asks & I've never judged her for it. There is one caveat in that she enjoys anal sex. She's all but demanded that I do it with her. But I can guarantee only one. After she has cummed many, many times, she wants rough vaginal penetration. Were I younger and able to go all night, I'd probably do it. Other than that, if she asks, I'll do it. And well before I cum, I'll ask her where she wants it. 50% of the time it's inside of her. The rest could be in her mouth, breasts, face, or what she's feeling at the moment. Never once have I judged her for her sexual desires or her sexual past. The way I see it, I'm beneficiary of her considerable sexual skills.

              If I could give anyone advice it'd be find your best friend, and openly discuss sex without judgment or betrayal. Heck, I'd marry a porn star were she my best friend and I were in love with her. But I'd probably ask her to find a new line of work.

              The Golden Rule controls relationship success or failure.

              Never, ever violate a woman's trust.

              BTW, I have no clue of how many hours of video I have of my g/f and I. I've written many times that she's a bedroom porn star. Well, she's videoed some of it. I have hundreds of photos of her posing nude. She loved it. Well, we were in an argument some years ago, She told me that I'd post videos & photos of her out of spite. I told her that if she wanted them, I'd give her the entire collection. She knew I'd never violate her trust. Only a scum bag dude would do that. Anyway, she's never asked for them because she knows that I'd never violate trust she has in me.

              She has told me that when she was younger, she would have considered doing porn if her parents wouldn't have found out. From what I know about her, I don't doubt it.

              Comment

              • jns
                Assistant Admin
                • Mar 2010
                • 8398

                Originally posted by WaveRider
                Opposites might attract, but the same will stay together.
                I believe that this is too narrow of a definition of who will stay together. True opposites, those opposite in almost everything, may not stay together. Those couples who have the same preferences in many things but a significant number of different preferences may stay together if they can compromise.

                My wife of 27 years is from Thailand where I met her and married her. My education level is high, hers is low. I like to travel more than she does. We have some likes of the same foods and different foods that only one of us likes. Our tastes in music are some same and a lot different. Many other things follow a similar pattern.
                I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience.
                ...
                Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot?

                From a speech by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775 at St. John's Church, Richmond, Virginia

                Comment

                • WaveRider
                  Veteran Member
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 701

                  Good Morning, jns,

                  It's ecumenical that two people will not be identical in every aspect of life. That was not my intent nor my meaning. Rather, "same stay together" refers to commonality of core beliefs. Sex is an extremely important component of an enduring relationship. If discord dominates a couple's sexual wants and desires, it will seep into and contaminate other components of a relationship.

                  I couldn't care less if my wife or g/f were not compatible in insignificant areas. I would care a lot if she were a tweaker. That'd be an instant deal breaker.

                  Comment

                  • amy40
                    Veteran Member
                    • Nov 2016
                    • 2732

                    Originally posted by WaveRider
                    I would care a lot if she were a tweaker.
                    which definition

                    compulsive liar/thief OR addict

                    Comment

                    • WaveRider
                      Veteran Member
                      • Mar 2017
                      • 701

                      Hi amy40,

                      Tweaker = meth addict.

                      Comment

                      or

                      Womens Health orange logoGet The Newsletter

                      Join our weekly newsletter and get the latest thought-provoking bold research and fearless conversations about sex - plus exclusive product giveaways - delivered to your inbox.

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      Latest Topics

                      Collapse

                      • PCOS and unwanted hair growth

                        Does anyone have any experience with PCOS and getting rid of unwanted facial hair? What started as one singular strand on my chin in my 20s has turned...

                        07-27-2026, 07:25 AM By Birdie_567
                      Working...