[anonymouswhitefemale]

It's the Daily Mail.

I'm not quite sure when they've ever published facts.

[Little]

See, how are we poor Yankees supposed to know that?
At least they had the dignity to somewhat doubt it.

[x.st.angel.x]

I know for a fact i have a g-spot, i can feel it! i think those scientists need better methods than a questionaire!

Orgasms are a different cup of tea though, i think that they work differently for everyone.

[anonymouswhitefemale]

My favourite Daily Mail headline was "toast the happy couple" - to cover a story where a woman was struck by lightning and killed on her honeymoon.

Classic journalism.

[ItsASecret]

The only part of this study that has the potential for a "job well done" is the part of using twin studies since science relies on these studies very heavily however the execution of this particular study is extremely flawed. Asking "do yo have a G-spot?" and a patient saying "no" is hardly a reason to claim that no G-spot exists. And like everyone has said before some women have no clue about their anatomy, they could claim to have this spot solely to fit in with all the other women who supposedly do, they could say no because they have never heard of the spot...and so on and so on. Unless they publish a real paper with significant statistical results this particular study is garbage.

Anatomically speaking some women do have a more dense tissue area along their vaginal wall, however having a more dense area of tissue does not mean it occurs in the same way in all women. Therefore there is absolutely going to be women who can physically feel the G-spot lump and I think at the same time there are going to be women who do not have any particular area of tissue that fully envelopes into that same almond sized sensitive mass. I do think the G-spot exists though, even though there is no more nerve endings in the said location relative to any other part of the vaginal cavity.

From the psychological aspect I can see why there can be claims of it being "in the head". Not only because the subject sells but because it can be comforting to know of some spot that is supposed to "guarantee orgasm". However, if anatomically a woman really does not have a more dense area that does not envelope into a noticeable bump then how in the world is she going to say "yes that is my G-spot"? She is going to do a routine assumption. She is going to use the popular science method of sex therapists and the media to assume that whatever spot she touches that resulted in an orgasm the other day is the so-called G-spot. Even though there may be no anatomical reason for her to believe so. Now I am all for science, and like I said I do believe there is a G-spot however it is women like I just described that cause the discrepancy of whether or not a the Grafenberg Spot exists. I do feel a result when I rub my "G-spot" and it may not result in an orgasm every time but to me that is enough of a result to be convinced that it does exist in my body.

[Texasred]

That is CRAZY!!! If it's a myth.... Well, then, I'm a mythical being and you all better watch out.

Like a unicorn??

[Texasred]

Some British scientists just did a study on 1,804 British women (they filled out questionnaires) and now they are saying, definitively I might add, that the G-spot is a "myth"...

Share your thoughts!

I think some British scientists have made a huge myth-take!

I have a close friend who could prove them wrong!
And I have known other women who would also laugh at their silly little survey, which sounds as if it is as scientifically sound as any of those "Here, vote on this!" surveys you find on so many webpages!

[StillLearnin]

Those "scientists" had an agenda to prove that the G spot doesn't exist, so they skewed the tests and results to make it match their biased beliefs.
I have never personally experienced G spot stimulation (giving, not receiving, for obvious reasons) so I don't personally know that it exists either.
But I'm willing to help in the research to find it!

[Texinator]

Wonder if it's just silliness on the part of the scientists or if they had an agenda.

[WildChild]

Sounds like sour grapes- I can't find it...so

Based on that premise I could state that fully functional computer printers are a figment of the imagination, cell phones that do more than call or text don't exist and all vehicles have noisy heaters - after all, that's my reality.