[ItsASecret]

I am suddenly affraid of what "growth" is occuring in a females nether regions.

A lot of growth. The more folds and skin a woman has in her nether regions the more surface area that will be crawling with bacterial critters. No warm shower is going to get rid of them all, same applies to men especially when they have an extra area to hide the growth as is the case with uncircumcised men. I was just commenting on the post saying that they thought it was not entirely true that being circumcised provides a more "clean and healthy" environment...when it does if you are speaking 100% on an anatomical point.

Brilliant..

[Texinator]

Oops, meant to post this here instead of the other thread, but...

One of the fun aspects of foreskin is that no lube is required for any kind of penile stimulation.

That's not a very nice thing to say even if you believe it. I don't think you'd be to happy if a man said a certain part of your anatomy looked horrible.

That would be up to him, he could take it or leave it..What I said is just my opinion and I'm not imposing it on anybody else..

[WildChild]

Another thing to consider is ...... sure most women agree that the looks of a circumcised penis is more "attractive" but it is all in what you're used to. If all you had ever seen was a natural penis it would be just as attractive and one that had been circumcised would look odd to you.

This is rather like men being 'conditioned' to find big boobs more desireable than the variety women are actually born to have. The first time I saw an uncircumsized penis, I was a bit nonplussed but soon got over it. Actually they are facinating uncut, errect they look so different, it's like a treasure.

sidenyalive, if you think it looks horrible, have you ever looked at the female vagina ?? I have seen hundreds. Yes some are more attractive than others, but ALL are natural. And that's the way all genitals, male and female, should be. (this doesn't include shaving which is only a temporary measure anyway)

[WildChild]

Ok, why did they have it removed in adulthood ?

Often for medical reasons related to the actual structure of the penis from birth. For example about 1 out of every 100 men is born with the ureter located on the shaft of the penis rather than in the head. In some case this is not an issue but if it is too close to the base or there are other annomalies such as a hooked penis (so curved that intercourse would be difficult or impossible) surgery can correct it and the foreskin makes the best skin graft for this. In other cases the foreskin could be so tight that it doesn't retract properly.

Penises come in all sizes, shapes and configurations, most are just great but every once in a while a male is born with a condition that requires correction to allow him full use and enjoyment of that wonderful part of his body.

[Fallen1]

Sorry but it just looks horrible

That's not a very nice thing to say even if you believe it. I don't think you'd be to happy if a man said a certain part of your anatomy looked horrible.

Sorry but it just looks horrible

[Fallen1]

Pffft the whole notion of comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is rediculas and juvenile at best..

No you can't compare the two BUT the key issue here is that BOTH are done without the boy/girls approval. It is forced upon them by someone else.

Another thing to consider is ...... sure most women agree that the looks of a circumcised penis is more "attractive" but it is all in what you're used to. If all you had ever seen was a natural penis it would be just as attractive and one that had been circumcised would look odd to you.