[Guest]

Pffft the whole notion of comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is rediculas and juvenile at best..

[Guest]

The thing is Fallen1, that men that are already circumcised believe that their sons should be as well. It's something that just follows tradition/generations. Nobody ever stops and says "hey, why are we doing this, isn't this brabaric, and in a day and age when human rights are to the forefront, shouldn't we let the boy decide later in life" As I said in a previous thread, someday we will regard this as barbaric, unnecessary and gross. Remember, even in the Bible there is no proof that it occurred. The Bible is a faith, Religion. It is what people believe but that doesn't mean it is true!

[Guest]

There's a good reason why women would want men with foreskins anyway. When he has one, he must be gentle on entry into the woman otherwise he could tear or injure his skin. Without a foreskin he can just ram it in if he so wants (not saying circumcised men do this)

[Fallen1]

Pffft the whole notion of comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is rediculas and juvenile at best..

No you can't compare the two BUT the key issue here is that BOTH are done without the boy/girls approval. It is forced upon them by someone else.

Another thing to consider is ...... sure most women agree that the looks of a circumcised penis is more "attractive" but it is all in what you're used to. If all you had ever seen was a natural penis it would be just as attractive and one that had been circumcised would look odd to you.

[Guest]

Sorry but it just looks horrible

[Fallen1]

Sorry but it just looks horrible

That's not a very nice thing to say even if you believe it. I don't think you'd be to happy if a man said a certain part of your anatomy looked horrible.

[WildChild]

Ok, why did they have it removed in adulthood ?

Often for medical reasons related to the actual structure of the penis from birth. For example about 1 out of every 100 men is born with the ureter located on the shaft of the penis rather than in the head. In some case this is not an issue but if it is too close to the base or there are other annomalies such as a hooked penis (so curved that intercourse would be difficult or impossible) surgery can correct it and the foreskin makes the best skin graft for this. In other cases the foreskin could be so tight that it doesn't retract properly.

Penises come in all sizes, shapes and configurations, most are just great but every once in a while a male is born with a condition that requires correction to allow him full use and enjoyment of that wonderful part of his body.

[Guest]

sidenyalive, if you think it looks horrible, have you ever looked at the female vagina ?? I have seen hundreds. Yes some are more attractive than others, but ALL are natural. And that's the way all genitals, male and female, should be. (this doesn't include shaving which is only a temporary measure anyway)

[WildChild]

Another thing to consider is ...... sure most women agree that the looks of a circumcised penis is more "attractive" but it is all in what you're used to. If all you had ever seen was a natural penis it would be just as attractive and one that had been circumcised would look odd to you.

This is rather like men being 'conditioned' to find big boobs more desireable than the variety women are actually born to have. The first time I saw an uncircumsized penis, I was a bit nonplussed but soon got over it. Actually they are facinating uncut, errect they look so different, it's like a treasure.

[Guest]

That's not a very nice thing to say even if you believe it. I don't think you'd be to happy if a man said a certain part of your anatomy looked horrible.

That would be up to him, he could take it or leave it..What I said is just my opinion and I'm not imposing it on anybody else..