This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • beethovengenius
    replied
    Originally posted by circus
    In my experience it has not been a myth at all!

    They really do have larger penises from I have seen. I think every white woman has heard of the "myth" and been curious about it.
    How many black men have you slept with exactly?

    Leave a comment:


  • beethovengenius
    replied
    Originally posted by danaeargos
    I am quite fair skinned with freckles, though I'm not considered ginger for my hair is honey blonde. The black man I experience in my earlier twenties was ebony black. I have to say it was one of the most incredible nights of my life. We both rather enjoyed watching ourselves in the mirror. The stark contrast between my white skin against his black skin was beautiful, and erotic. He was big, at least 11 inches, and uncircumcised. I enjoyed it immensely, but not all of him fit, and I like to have that pelvic contact.
    Did you actually measure him with a tape? Most people cannot measure accurately with their eyes. I find it very difficult to believe that he had a foot long penis lol. "but not all of him fit, and I like to have that pelvic contact." You are honestly surprised that a foot long penis did not fit all the way in. Also statistically speaking an 11 inch penis would make him 99.999 per cent bigger than the rest of the male world population which again I find very hard to believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arvan
    replied
    Originally posted by a_dub
    Kenyans and Ethiopians are only good at distance running. 2 reasons...they have the physique for it and they either come from or train in high altitude regions where they grow accustomed to lower oxygen tension in the air. This has 2 physiologic effects. First it causes an expansion in their red cell mass (polycythemia) which increases the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood. Secondly they have increased levels of DPG or 2,3 BPG which facilitates oxygen release to their muscle tissue. Both effects are synergistic.

    However you don't see Kenyans or Ethiopians in the 100 or 200 meter dash. That would the domain of Jamaicans, Americans, and Canadians. Usain Bolt, Michael Johnson, Donovan Bailey, Asafa Powell...they are all black.

    Not sure about the penis size thing. It might be be that blacks are only marginally bigger, but the few I've seen they were a lot bigger in the flaccid state. White guys had penises that are the same size as mine.
    If you want seriously analyzed differences in sports capabilities- go to Steve Sailer's blog. There you got all that may be interesting to you.

    As for penis size- it's as tacky as it is absurd. I suppose this topic is of paramount importance for insecure white and Asian guys (re sexuality), for blacks (as a sort of consolation prize- imaginary, anyway, for all the functional deficiencies this population encounters in modern and post-modern world), and for size queen females who are, let's be frank, (mild ?) psychos.

    Leave a comment:


  • a_dub
    replied
    Kenyans and Ethiopians are only good at distance running. 2 reasons...they have the physique for it and they either come from or train in high altitude regions where they grow accustomed to lower oxygen tension in the air. This has 2 physiologic effects. First it causes an expansion in their red cell mass (polycythemia) which increases the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood. Secondly they have increased levels of DPG or 2,3 BPG which facilitates oxygen release to their muscle tissue. Both effects are synergistic.

    However you don't see Kenyans or Ethiopians in the 100 or 200 meter dash. That would the domain of Jamaicans, Americans, and Canadians. Usain Bolt, Michael Johnson, Donovan Bailey, Asafa Powell...they are all black.

    Not sure about the penis size thing. It might be be that blacks are only marginally bigger, but the few I've seen they were a lot bigger in the flaccid state. White guys had penises that are the same size as mine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arvan
    replied
    Originally posted by a_dub
    Black athletes are not superior to any other race in sports. It appears that way in the NBA/NFL because the slave trade ensured that African Americans were genetics my modified to create super slaves. Thus they have a large percentage of genetic freaks. They were bred that way. But Africans are no more or less athletically inclined as other races.

    That being said, I believe black men do have bigger penises on average than other races. Sure an individual black man might be small and an individual white or Asian guy might be hung...but being a medical student I've seen more than my fair share of penises and I would say black guys are bigger. Doesn't mean they all look like Lexington Steele or Mandingo, but they are bigger.

    I'm Asian Indian, and I'm on the smaller side at a little over 5 inches.
    Hm... yet, Kenyan runners are among best in the world. No, from what sport writers and others have investigated, Bantus and their descendants have a capacity for explosive release of energy in short time period. So, you can find blacks among runners, among best basketball players, as well in American Football (except quarterbacks). You won't find them in male gymnastics, water polo, tennis, best soccer players (except a few Brazilian big names), power lifting, best mixed martial arts,...

    And this "penis thing" has really become absurd. Since I can't post links, I'll give a summary from a Nigerian medical journal:
    Tropical Journal of Medical Research

    “Oversized” Penile Length In The Black People; Myth Or Reality
    JC Orakwe, GU Ebuh

    Abstract

    Objective: Amongst the Caucasians and some non-Black races, there is the popular belief that the black people generally have longer penile sizes. Even the Blacks themselves tend to believe so. This study was carried out to test the veracity of this ascription of “oversized” penile length to people of the Black (Negro) race.

    Design: A prospective and comparative study

    Setting: The Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.

    Subjects and Method: Full-stretch flaccid penile lengths, and flaccid penile lengths, were measured in 115 adult men of the Black race in Nigeria. The results were compared with reported similar main studies on people of other races, which were accessible to the authors. These studies were done in Italy, Greece, Korea, Britain, and the United States of America.

    Result: The mean full-stretch penile length of the Nigerian Blacks was 13.37cm and the mean flaccid length was 9.36cm. Similar studies reported full-stretch penile lengths of 12.50cm in Italians, 12.18cm in Greeks, 9.6cm in Koreans, 13cm in British Caucasians, and 12.45cm in the American Caucasians. The penile length for Nigerian Blacks was longer than those of the other races, but the differences were only statistically different in comparison with the Koreans.

    Conclusion: There is the possibility of racial differences in penile sizes, but there is no convincing scientific background to support the ascription of bigger penile dimensions to people of the Black race

    Leave a comment:


  • a_dub
    replied
    Black athletes are not superior to any other race in sports. It appears that way in the NBA/NFL because the slave trade ensured that African Americans were genetics my modified to create super slaves. Thus they have a large percentage of genetic freaks. They were bred that way. But Africans are no more or less athletically inclined as other races.

    That being said, I believe black men do have bigger penises on average than other races. Sure an individual black man might be small and an individual white or Asian guy might be hung...but being a medical student I've seen more than my fair share of penises and I would say black guys are bigger. Doesn't mean they all look like Lexington Steele or Mandingo, but they are bigger.

    I'm Asian Indian, and I'm on the smaller side at a little over 5 inches.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arvan
    replied
    Originally posted by jns
    Fierce individual warriors, the Mongols unified strongly under strong central leadership. Even small countries can be militarily strong if there is great leadership and a populace willing to strongly unite. Superior individual traits are not enough.
    Yeah, but Africans don't have superior warrior traits. Since policy of this forum prevents me (or anyone) from posting external links and giving credence to statements, I think I'll refrain from posting much here. Suffice to say that elite US combat units (SEALs, Green Berets, Rangers, ...anyway, the best special units in all three US Armed Forces branches) are composed of whites, more than 95% (blacks or African-Americans are simply not good enough to pass the very demanding training tests). Therefore Obama has repeatedly pushed for lowering of standards for elite units.

    The same for MMA (Mixed Martial Arts) where whites (and white Latinos) dominate- with some very good fighters of African descent. So, on individual level, I'm not just talking about charismatic leaders or level of military organization. People of African descent are superior to others in a few fields- they mostly run faster and jump higher. Therefore their dominance in track and field and basketball. But you won't find them- or will, in rather small percentages- among top athletes in motor sports, tennis, soccer or world football, winter sports, air sports, extreme sports, weight lifting, water polo, swimming (higher bone density), handball, other water sports and most of gymnastics and contact sports. Out of 50-100 sport fields, white males dominate in over 90%.

    So much about individual physical dominance.
    Last edited by Arvan; 10-29-2014, 02:25 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jns
    replied
    Originally posted by Arvan
    Militarily defeated, slaves, masses colonized by a bunch of European adventurers.... absolutely no strength here. If you were talking about that terror of history, Mongols, I'd be saying something else.
    Fierce individual warriors, the Mongols unified strongly under strong central leadership. Even small countries can be militarily strong if there is great leadership and a populace willing to strongly unite. Superior individual traits are not enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Motorguy
    replied
    Well most myth are started by people who don't know the real facts. This go's about you tell a story to one person and by the time that one person tells that story by the 100 person telling it the story has completely change from the original story.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arvan
    replied
    For the 1st post from a man from Central-Eastern Europe, this is really a weird place to start. But, never mind. What I'm reading here are typical responses from Anglosphere females (I've spent a few years in the US, so I think I know something about it) virtually no male or female from South or Eastern Europe would assent to.

    So, from a double-outsider perspective (white male, European- but one who has spent his formative years in communism), here are my $ 0.02:

    1. there is no unique response to physical attraction to other sex (if you're a heterosexual)
    2. most women I've seen in the US simply don't care about other races than white
    3. also, the level of female (and male) promiscuity is much higher in Anglosphere (including NZ- been there too)
    4. the most important sex organ is brain. So, endless talking about schlongs is absurd- especially if you have in mind that most male members are, more or less, the same size: Link edited5. what-sexually- matters most is a mixture of "culture" and "biology". For instance, some white men have Asian fetish; some white women have African fetish. But, these are relatively small percentages:Link edited6. at the end: what I found bizarre in the US is that blacks are frequently associated with virility and confidence. Honestly, I don't know how this myth came into existence. Here, in an all-white country that has, historically, hadn't participated in colonialism and imperialism- Africans (and African-Americans) are prototype of weakness and defeat. Militarily defeated, slaves, masses colonized by a bunch of European adventurers.... absolutely no strength here. If you were talking about that terror of history, Mongols, I'd be saying something else.
    Last edited by CHANDLERS WISH; 10-28-2014, 12:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:

or

Womens Health orange logoGet The Newsletter

Join our weekly newsletter and get the latest thought-provoking bold research and fearless conversations about sex - plus exclusive product giveaways - delivered to your inbox.

Latest Activity

Collapse

Latest Topics

Collapse

  • Men and woman - rejecting someone?

    Out of curiosity, what is the most respectful way you've ever been rejected or "friendzoned." I always feel terrible and like to do it in the...

    10-15-2026, 02:44 PM By Birdie_567
  • Birth Control Thoughts

    How are we all handling birth control now these days? I got the Nexaplanon 5 years ago and its time for a renewal. When I got it there was a huge buzz...

    09-15-2026, 12:29 PM By Birdie_567
  • Women - not climaxing

    Hello, I’m 40, a cis woman, and I’ve been married for 10 years. We were having sex and I was nearly to climax when it sort of just dissipated. This...

    09-08-2026, 08:19 PM By Mermaidsheets
Working...