[MiracleRiver]

Please do be careful about who you quote.

The "research": Does male circumcision affect sexual function, sensitivity, or satisfaction?--a systematic review. Was compiled by "Brian J Morris" - a circumcision obsessive, who publishes medical "research" into the "benefits" of male genital mutilation - none of this research he does himself; he just cherry picks to suit his argument.

Recently, a colleague of Brian J. Morris', who he had written a pro-circumcision pamphlet with, was convicted of child sex-abuse and possession of child pornography - including pictures of infants and young children undergoing the forced amputation of their foreskins. And both were members of a circumcision fetish website: The Gilgal Society.

His "research" has also been widely discredited within the scientific and research community:

[links removed]

[Little]

MiracleRiver, we don't allow outbound links on WH. We also promote harmonious discourse and being kind to the opinions of others. Please curtail your future posts to match our guidelines.

EDIT: Also copyright theft, that's bad. Stop doing it.

[MiracleRiver]

OK. Apologies. I understand if you want to delete my posts and/or remove the links.

Shame that all those links to peer-reviewed health science will not longer be available to educate folks!

You run a great website. Thanks.

[Little]

If you'd like to stay and talk, please do, but I have had to delete your posts that contain extensive copy/paste from outside websites. Our linking policy turns that into copyright theft and can cause serious problems for us.

We're about talking to each other here; though lots of articles are great and informative, and peer-reviewed science is wonderful, it doesn't make great conversation.

[MiracleRiver]

Understood. Apologies again.

Not sure what you mean by "copyright theft"? Linking to articles and YouTube videos is not copyright theft.

[Little]

Because we can't allow you to link back to the articles/reddit posts you were quoting, and that content likely belongs to the websites it originally appeared on, repeating the exact same paragraphs here would constitute "copyright theft" and is often followed by a DCMA takedown request (or hopefully just a friendly email) from the owner of the content, as we have no right to repost it without credit.

[MiracleRiver]

OK. How is this:

Did you know that male circumcision can impact female sexual health and response? Research is Denmark concluded:

Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment.

[Little]

A-ok! Welcome to the conversation

[MiracleRiver]

Understood. Apologies again.

You might take sneaky look at some of my link though because they are very interesting and right up your street :-)

[jasminerose08]

Circumcision is a matter of personal preference. But in many countries it is a matter of culture and it began in Israel. The question of whether circumcision is beneficial or bad news for a man's sex life — and his health — is still a matter for debate. But per medical term, circumcised is healthier and more hygienic. It prevents recurring infections of the head of the penis, avoiding obstruction of urine flow that can result when the prepuce's opening narrows, and preventing a tight prepuce from retracting over the glans.