[Ashlee T.]

I've experienced both, and I do prefer a circumsized penis. My first "uncircumsized" experience was kind of a surprise. Until intercourse, I hadn't seen his penis. So when intercourse began, it felt like he had put on a condom that was much too big or something. In fact, the odd feeling I felt was his foreskin. I truly believe it limited the sensation I felt, and I must say that in several times of having sex with him, I never had an orgasm. So, it's just a preference and can be different for us all.

[angelfz]

anonymouswhitefemale,
there's enough and enough scientific and health reports on the advantages of male circumssn. many health concerned men have done this.sexual pleasure is an extra bonus and gift. i am in my early twenties and one of my close friends twice had sex with an uncut close b.friend but said it was a total disaster due to early ejaculation and an elastic feeling of the penis cap skin. finally she broke away with him though he was very cute.now shes with a cut BF and she's highly satisfied and creative, though this guy is bit rude she loves him most. she says that he has a wonderful control over his penis with respect to ejaculation in lengthy sex. as per most of my friends this is the case. may be different for others.

[anonymouswhitefemale]

Many scientific studies? Show them to me.

The most I've seen, is that the transmission rate for HIV is reduced, from something like one in fifty thousand to one in a hundred thousand. So, all it might do is encourage unprotected and irresponsible sex.

Do you know why the Jews started cutting away at our willies? It's because of two reasons. The first is that they never washed, and if you never wash, circumcision results in a cleaner penis, therefore less infections. Let me stress that this is only a factor if you do not wash. In the modern era when we have showers, and baths, and sinks - radical surgery is not an alternative to bathing.

The second reason we started snipping foreskins, was rooted in religious and social prudishness. Foreskins were removed to stop boys from playing with themselves. Yep, circumcision was about intentionally preventing men from experiencing pleasure. And that it does rather well, without a foreskin you need artificial lubrication to masturbate - also fully over 1/2 of the fine touch receptors in the penis are removed, never to be experienced again. With no hope of returning. WITHOUT CONSENT.

Men are different. Some men will come fast, some men will come slow. As I have already mentioned in this thread, it is almost an issue for me how long it takes for me to come, so if I was circumcised I probably wouldn't be able to come at all. The fact that you had sex with an unsatisfying man is not reason enough to commit or encourage this act of barbarism.

Given your poor spelling and the fact that you're obviously American, I would also hazard a guess that you're religious. If you are, why on earth do you think that 'god' would create the foreskin in the first place? Or if you aren't religious, why do you think that evolution would have led to it's existence? The answer to both of these questions is the same: it serves a purpose.

Honestly, your narrow mindedness and inability to think ethically and rationally about this subject makes me despair - one day a poor baby man will probably have his penis mutilated by you, and you aren't intelligent enough to reach through discussion. It seems there isn't anything I can do to save your future children from this savagery, which is sad.

[anonymouswhitefemale]

Oh, I forgot to mention the frequent complications and scarring resulting from circumcision - with followup surgery required.

So.... consider that mentioned...

[CHANDLERS WISH]

Anon, this is close to your heart and as such everyone who disagrees with you, will get a tongue lashing as such...of your "beliefs and opinions"...

But, it is people's right to make their own choices, regardless, it doesn't make them narrow minded, it's their own "beliefs and opinions".. And quit with the American thing.

CW

[Livelaughlove]

I understand where anon is coming from. The fact that women have the ability to make this decision without the consent of there newborn child is absurd.

A mans penis is our pride and joy... And the fact that you women have NO CLUE of how significant it is to us (you just think you do) and able to make this decision is scary..

The fact that the fathers of these children are not man enough to stand up to the mother of there child is pathetic.

I want every women that responded to this thread answer this and/or ones that are thinking of circumcising there child!

How would you women like it if your father chose to cut off your clitoris because he thinks it looks better without one or because some religious belief?

[Livelaughlove]

Anon there are millions of women out there that are going to make this decision we really can't do much about it.

The only thing we can do is make sure our child doesn't become a victim

Live laugh and love

[Fallen1]

How would you women like it if your father chose to cut off your clitoris because he thinks it looks better without one or because some religious belief?

I'm not going to get into the discussion but I think anyone with since knows this is not even close to a comparison. Cutting a woman's clit off is basically equivalent to cutting the head of the penis off. I think maybe cutting the clitoral hood off is more equivalent.

[Livelaughlove]

I'm not going to get into the discussion but I think anyone with since knows this is not even close to a comparison. Cutting a woman's clit off is basically equivalent to cutting the head of the penis off. I think maybe cutting the clitoral hood off is more equivalent.

Thats only because your not seeing our side!

The question remains... Please answer

[Fallen1]

Thats only because your not seeing our side!

The question remains... Please answer

Has nothing to do with sides ..... the two are not equivalent.