X
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest

    Originally posted by ItsASecret
    Right now I have one eyebrow up and a confused look on my face. Its like your saying "but but but I saw this elsewhere so it must be right". Porn is hardly a credible source, did you forget that it is edited, every single aspect of it? One minute you are referring to a guy in a porno as an example of what women should/could/can take and then next you are saying that only "doctor studies" are credible. Well Dr. Alfred Kinsey did some brilliant work in sexology.



    You are babbling on about flaccid size, black guys, Asian doctors, post cards, Dr. Kinsey not doing a good study, man in porno stuffing random porno girl, inch variation, what women should take, how porn is a good example of taking it, 10 minute google ventures, and to top it all off "I'm well studied in this". When I read your posts all I can think is "what is this guy talking about". Many people think that there is a difference between a man's ethnicity and penis size...is it an absolute fact? Of course not. It is often a joke around the table that say a black man's penis is bigger than an Asian man's. Does anyone actually care? I would venture a guess to say no. A penis is a penis. There is going to be a difference between all men.
    You should watch Mandigo's videos so you will better know what you speak of. All of his videos are shot in a rather boring no frills filming and no odd special angles. And he almost always does the same routines in almost the same way and order. It's like the exact same cameraman is always used.

    Sure, I'd rather that there were doctor measured studies on vagina handle ranges to go by. There's only very very general info to go on.

    It's clear to me now that you have no intention on being truly objective about this. I said that Kinsey and staff did meet with people one on one in various aspects of sex. I gave him credit for that. But as I pointed out that, in the penis size part they didn't and that was point I was making since so many people refer to Kinsey when they speak about penis size. You want me to be super credible, but I guess you don't require it of Kinsey posters? Maybe you've used Kinsey yourself as a reference and this is why you defended it in a rather vague way? Just saying, since you didn't seem to see my point, or probably more to the point, refuse to recognise it. There was no point in your saying that some of his work in sexology was brilliant, as though I said it wasn't. You wide brushed over my point. Believe me when I tell you i could point out so many flaws to folks posts when it comes to this stuff. They refer to Masters and Johnson as gold standard for saying what penis size is. They are so misinformed. And on and on it goes.

    Have you or others here ever set them straight on any of it? Or perhaps you do the same? I'm not personally attacking you, I'm asking if you are just like the masses when it comes to this. If you are you should realise that I am more credible in my postings than the masses. They don't get questioned but yet I do. I use doctor measured studies when possible. If not posssible I try to make sure there is at least a connecting of dots exists. Sure, on vagina ranges I've had to resort to Mandingo videos. But at least the difference in ranges falls in line with the difference in ranges between black and white guys. That at least may indicate some backing. Also, I use to visit the BET forum some back when it was hopping and the black ladies there chose an ideal penis size range that was, yep, about a inch (actually a bit more) higher than the range white women choose. That's is when the women will state an ideal range, as about 25% of women refuse to do so, saying it makes no difference. You're attempting to put a negative spin on my postings by breaking the info down into various words. For instance, you say I speak of post cards and Kinsey. Well, In order to explain about Kinsey I thought it would be good to tell about the post cards and how they were used for self measurement. I could have just said Kinsey was self measured, but chose to give some explanation. That beats vague 'no behind the scenes' postings. It helps to show that the poster may be better informed than the typical poster is. There is too much vagueness on the internet. Those posters often don't know what they are talking about and yet I'm the bad guy. My postings are not pc and usually not well received. I can't win for losing.
    Last edited by Guest; 02-28-2010, 11:20 AM.

    Comment

    • Hopeless Dork
      Veteran Member
      • Dec 2008
      • 4255

      Mandingos porns were made to make revenue... his name alone indicates he's some stud with an all powerfull tool... so would it make sense for his movies to depict women having such a grand time taking all of his penis? Nah.. it would make more sense for them to struggle with it and stop short of being able to. The variances in doing so are probably based on the actresses ability to stay in character while having sex.. and the inability to be accurate in stopping at certain inch intervals etc.

      I am not saying that his penis should of easily fit. If his name was bob I wouldn't be as skeptical but given his name and the fact that its porn... him having a huge member that is hard for these women to take is all apart of the fantasy this particular porn genre is selling.
      Scars remind us of where we've been...they don't have to dictate where we're going.

      Comment

      • Guest

        Originally posted by Hopeless Dork
        Mandingos porns were made to make revenue... his name alone indicates he's some stud with an all powerfull tool... so would it make sense for his movies to depict women having such a grand time taking all of his penis? Nah.. it would make more sense for them to struggle with it and stop short of being able to. The variances in doing so are probably based on the actresses ability to stay in character while having sex.. and the inability to be accurate in stopping at certain inch intervals etc.

        I am not saying that his penis should of easily fit. If his name was bob I wouldn't be as skeptical but given his name and the fact that its porn... him having a huge member that is hard for these women to take is all apart of the fantasy this particular porn genre is selling.
        Once again, I wish you would first watch his videos first. You're making an assumption that could apply but doesn't. It's not like what you say. Sure, at some point eventually in various positions he does try to see how far it will go. His penis will actually buckle a bit. He hasn't just been with women who couldn't get the last three inches in. He's been with women who could take it all and with with very many women who who could take somewhere inbetween the least and the most. It has varied greatly. There is an audience and money to be made no matter what. I posted this point earlier in this thread. My main point is that there have not been any women who left more than 3 inches out and there have been women who could take it all and could have taken more, and therefore has helped me create a general estimation of what women can handle (this doesn't include Asian women). He's got a quite long penis and there are plenty of women who can't take it all. I'm versitile in what I like to see. I like it when he could 'knock there bottom out' so to speak, and I like it when she handles all of him like he ain't enough for her. Either way turns me on. I don't know if most guys are as versitile about this as I am. I like it when he can't get a peep vocalwise out of a woman, like she takes him quite well , and I like it when she yelps like crazy . But that's just me.
        Last edited by Guest; 02-28-2010, 11:55 AM.

        Comment

        • CHANDLERS WISH
          • Mar 2008
          • 22440

          It's okay to "debate" on this Forum, thoughts, however, let's not lose sight of the OP's thread. I haven't seen where she is asking for a description of races and their sizes.

          In addition, the vagina will accomodate any size in general, it's my opinion it's your mind that can't adjust and if that abe the case, your body won't either.

          Lastly, let's not use words such as "your babbling", that's condecending and borders, putting down a poster... Please keep your words to objectives, questions, opinions, or this thread will be closed.

          CW
          PUT A LITTLE 'LIKE' IN MY SOUL!

          Comment

          • CHANDLERS WISH
            • Mar 2008
            • 22440

            Steph if your still around, seeing as you quit posting around page 4 and topic.

            It's going to have to be your call, your going to have to get your head around it. It's obvious that (visual) of a man naked, in boxers, is a sexual turn on to you, nothing wrong at all with that, I'm with you there and the excitement of seeing it going up and "not bad" to look at, is a turn on.

            If your sexually stimulated by this sight, then it's going to be very difficult for you to overcome this.

            If it was only about "in bed" then I think, you could have overcome that with the bond that you two develop, of love, but your basically saying " he's a nice guy and he doesn't excite me to look at him". I don't believe your going to let your mind and therefore, heart fall in love.

            I think your a visual person, you want to feel and make love and you need the visual to do that.

            It would be good if you would let us know your still about and how your feeling.

            CW
            PUT A LITTLE 'LIKE' IN MY SOUL!

            Comment

            • Guest

              Originally posted by CHANDLERS WISH
              It's okay to "debate" on this Forum, thoughts, however, let's not lose sight of the OP's thread. I haven't seen where she is asking for a description of races and their sizes.

              In addition, the vagina will accomodate any size in general, it's my opinion it's your mind that can't adjust and if that abe the case, your body won't either.

              Lastly, let's not use words such as "your babbling", that's condecending and borders, putting down a poster... Please keep your words to objectives, questions, opinions, or this thread will be closed.

              CW
              You're right of course, I've gotten off topic. One sentence or two in another post about women and how much they can handle got me going.

              I too would like for the OP to come back and let us know what has happened since she last posted. I don't really have anything extra to add to what you said to her. I wish I could help more with some earth shaking advice, but alas I can't. What you said is the way I see it too. I'm a data guy and while at times I can find ways to make it useful to OPs, and possibly even helpful, there are many times I can't. Spock types (Star Trek) often can't help much with the emotional decision type questions. I thought your posting was logical. Made good sense and wasn't PC (which sort of impressed me).
              Last edited by Guest; 02-28-2010, 04:51 PM.

              Comment

              • CHANDLERS WISH
                • Mar 2008
                • 22440

                often can't help much with the emotional decision type questions.
                Our brains work differently, and every bit of information in my opinion helps a person mentally, in their decisions, pending on how their mind thinks and which part of information they can relate to the most.

                Emotions are a funny thing, they play a bit part in our lives

                CW
                PUT A LITTLE 'LIKE' IN MY SOUL!

                Comment

                • Goodgirl93
                  Veteran Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 2634

                  Originally posted by CHANDLERS WISH
                  In addition, the vagina will accomodate any size in general, it's my opinion it's your mind that can't adjust and if that abe the case, your body won't either.
                  That's the answer I was looking for! Haha I've always wondered how a not so deep vagina could accomadate for a size bigger than average,but it does make sense that if the woman is well aroused,and less mind set on the matter,large penatration is very possible.

                  Comment

                  • Guest

                    Originally posted by Goodgirl93
                    That's the answer I was looking for! Haha I've always wondered how a not so deep vagina could accomadate for a size bigger than average,but it does make sense that if the woman is well aroused,and less mind set on the matter,large penatration is very possible.
                    When a woman is fully aroused/expanded/elasticated her posterior (bottom) wall can be pushed quite a lot just like the sides can. Also, but accounting for it much less, the head of a penis is squishy so when it meets resistence the penis is a bit shorter than when it first entered. Doggy allows for the deepest penetration. Missionary leads the penis into shallower ground, more so into the anterior fornix area rather than into the posterior fornix and posterior wall like doggy does.
                    Last edited by Guest; 02-28-2010, 08:21 PM.

                    Comment

                    or

                    Womens Health orange logoGet The Newsletter

                    Join our weekly newsletter and get the latest thought-provoking bold research and fearless conversations about sex - plus exclusive product giveaways - delivered to your inbox.

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    Latest Topics

                    Collapse

                    • PCOS and unwanted hair growth

                      Does anyone have any experience with PCOS and getting rid of unwanted facial hair? What started as one singular strand on my chin in my 20s has turned...

                      07-27-2026, 07:25 AM By Birdie_567
                    Working...