Sure, I'd rather that there were doctor measured studies on vagina handle ranges to go by. There's only very very general info to go on.
It's clear to me now that you have no intention on being truly objective about this. I said that Kinsey and staff did meet with people one on one in various aspects of sex. I gave him credit for that. But as I pointed out that, in the penis size part they didn't and that was point I was making since so many people refer to Kinsey when they speak about penis size. You want me to be super credible, but I guess you don't require it of Kinsey posters? Maybe you've used Kinsey yourself as a reference and this is why you defended it in a rather vague way? Just saying, since you didn't seem to see my point, or probably more to the point, refuse to recognise it. There was no point in your saying that some of his work in sexology was brilliant, as though I said it wasn't. You wide brushed over my point. Believe me when I tell you i could point out so many flaws to folks posts when it comes to this stuff. They refer to Masters and Johnson as gold standard for saying what penis size is. They are so misinformed. And on and on it goes.
Have you or others here ever set them straight on any of it? Or perhaps you do the same? I'm not personally attacking you, I'm asking if you are just like the masses when it comes to this. If you are you should realise that I am more credible in my postings than the masses. They don't get questioned but yet I do. I use doctor measured studies when possible. If not posssible I try to make sure there is at least a connecting of dots exists. Sure, on vagina ranges I've had to resort to Mandingo videos. But at least the difference in ranges falls in line with the difference in ranges between black and white guys. That at least may indicate some backing. Also, I use to visit the BET forum some back when it was hopping and the black ladies there chose an ideal penis size range that was, yep, about a inch (actually a bit more) higher than the range white women choose. That's is when the women will state an ideal range, as about 25% of women refuse to do so, saying it makes no difference. You're attempting to put a negative spin on my postings by breaking the info down into various words. For instance, you say I speak of post cards and Kinsey. Well, In order to explain about Kinsey I thought it would be good to tell about the post cards and how they were used for self measurement. I could have just said Kinsey was self measured, but chose to give some explanation. That beats vague 'no behind the scenes' postings. It helps to show that the poster may be better informed than the typical poster is. There is too much vagueness on the internet. Those posters often don't know what they are talking about and yet I'm the bad guy. My postings are not pc and usually not well received. I can't win for losing.
, and I like it when she yelps like crazy
. But that's just me.

Comment