This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kellyjones100
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 7

    I don't think you have anything to worry about, I've had many penises both circumcised and not, I have found that once the penis is erect there is no difference the head comes out and is fully displayed. Often its fun to have the skin at the time any way cause it keeps the penis nice and wet especially when giving head.

    Don't worry and enjoy your penis the way it is. Have FUN and if you know how to use it women will love you for it not what your penis looks like.

    Comment

    • Guest

      I don't care if men are circumcised or not. I love how a lovely, beautiful looks either way. Besides, it's a man's heart that matters.

      Comment

      • jonny
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2008
        • 117

        Yea, I know it is an old thread. but I didn't bump it.

        But two posts above the person said that when it is erect you can't tell a difference, and the skin goes back.

        Well I am uncut, and that is not the truth. When an uncut guy is erect, his skin doesn't just magically pull itself back.

        Atleast mine doesn't. Without it being manually pulled back. It stays exactly the same as it was when I am soft.

        Comment

        • Discostu55
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2008
          • 8

          Dude, they say circumsized is supposed to be bad, becuase u don't get as much plasure from it, and the women don't gt pleasure form it. On the other hand, u have to clean uncircumsized more. Just what i learned inn med school

          Comment

          • anonymouswhitefemale
            Veteran Member
            • Sep 2007
            • 1343

            Yep, if you choose to never wash, a circumcision is worth it!

            Otherwise....

            You know the biological purpose of the foreskin is to ease penetration?

            Comment

            • damd
              Veteran Member
              • May 2008
              • 259

              Not intending to criticize the question posed by this thread, but I find this discussion ridiculous. While I can see how someone would view circumcission as barbaric, I witnessed my son's and it was not at all pleasant. Needles injected into his growing, a bell placed over the head, a blunt instrument used to violently push back the foreskin, clamp used to cut off the circulation to the foreskin, and then the cutting, which at this time was the less evasive part of the proceedure. However there are stong religious and social influnces in this matter. And although the proceedure is somewhat barbaric there is no lasting long term effects, other than the missing foreskin. Sure I have heard of some rare occassions of a child suffering from infection, but that is very rare and usually the result of poor hygiene on the parent's part.

              Being a circumcised individual, I have never missed that part of me that was removed such a long time ago. Just like I don't ever miss my hair that was cut or nails that were trimmed. I don't view this matter really any different than piercing a little girls ears. I have never met an individual that has missed his foreskin, of course that topic has never came up in normal conversation as that would be extremely wierd. Sorry I am not a freak.

              As for not having foreskin hindering sensations while maturbating... Never was a problem. Masturbation felt just fine, infact if having foreskin makes masturbation feel better than I might be better off being circumcised as I would have probably never left the bathroom and maybe blind now...

              The purpose of the foreskin... huh I thought it was for protection of the nerve filled head of the penis. There was a time when our ancestors were running around naked through tall grass and such, I thought that was why males had that extra skin. So you see a circumcised male is actually more evolved.

              But to each his own, you like not being or being circumcised, great. Personally I like my unit the way it is, it's served me well so far, I have never recieved any complaints.



              Comment

              • Guest

                Originally posted by Discostu55
                Dude, they say circumsized is supposed to be bad, becuase u don't get as much plasure from it, and the women don't gt pleasure form it. On the other hand, u have to clean uncircumsized more. Just what i learned inn med school
                Yeah dude, I be in med skoo too. And everything you just said is wrong.

                Comment

                • CHANDLERS WISH
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 22440

                  Originally posted by littlethumper
                  Yeah dude, I be in med skoo too. And everything you just said is wrong.
                  Your spelling sucks littlhumper.

                  And, this is the persons opinion based on what he has learn't, so i assume you are disagreeing? Debating?


                  In fact you would have to clean un-circumsized more purely and simply as there is more to clean....

                  Debate by all means.
                  PUT A LITTLE 'LIKE' IN MY SOUL!

                  Comment

                  • damd
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2008
                    • 259

                    I think littlethumper was just having a little fun at the person she was quoting....

                    Comment

                    • funlovinglady
                      Member
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 18

                      Originally posted by radhabarwali
                      Circumcised penis thrusts hard, deep, longer giving us orgasms.
                      We squirt with circumcised clients.
                      Are you serious?

                      I have had my fair share of penises in all shapes and sizes, cut and uncut and I can assure you uncircumsized men can thrust just as hard and deep and as long as circumsized guys do.

                      I have no real preferance either way but I must admit that is better jer*ing off an uncircumsized guy because you do not need to lube him up to do it. If a guy has no foreskin it can get awfully dry and irritated if it lasts a while before he orgasms.

                      Comment

                      or

                      Womens Health orange logoGet The Newsletter

                      Join our weekly newsletter and get the latest thought-provoking bold research and fearless conversations about sex - plus exclusive product giveaways - delivered to your inbox.

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      Latest Topics

                      Collapse

                      • PCOS and unwanted hair growth

                        Does anyone have any experience with PCOS and getting rid of unwanted facial hair? What started as one singular strand on my chin in my 20s has turned...

                        07-27-2026, 07:25 AM By Birdie_567
                      Working...